Home

Advertisement

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Mar. 25th, 2004

  • 11:26 PM






























(huge old tractor)














Comments

( Leave a comment )
[info]10deep wrote:
Mar. 25th, 2004 09:11 pm (UTC)
amazing!

is this digital?
| Reply | Thread
[info]jen_shumate wrote:
Mar. 25th, 2004 09:13 pm (UTC)
yup :)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]10deep wrote:
Mar. 25th, 2004 09:14 pm (UTC)
wow... may i ask what kind of camera?
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]jen_shumate wrote:
Mar. 25th, 2004 09:19 pm (UTC)
nikon 4500. there are much better digital cameras out there though.
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]10deep wrote:
Mar. 25th, 2004 09:21 pm (UTC)
but ur photos have amazing quality.... unless ur really photoshop gifted... =P
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]jen_shumate wrote:
Mar. 25th, 2004 09:27 pm (UTC)
im not trying to toot my own horn, but its the photographer, not the camera. this is the case with other people and other cameras, ive found. if you have an eye for it, then the type of camera doesnt matter too much.... well, except for those throw aways, those are just horrid.
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]10deep wrote:
Mar. 25th, 2004 09:35 pm (UTC)
yeah, agreed....
everyone tells me that.... its true though, my friend has like the best camera in the world, but his pictures suck... lol
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]alrightfiasco wrote:
Mar. 26th, 2004 01:33 pm (UTC)
the saturation though has a lot to do with pixels on digitalssssss....and its really bright.i was gonna ask what camera you use.but question already answered. do you always use a digital camera for you pictures online?
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]jen_shumate wrote:
Mar. 27th, 2004 09:19 am (UTC)
80% of the time. i used vintage cameras for the black and white pics, and sometimes a canon rebel srl.
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]into_the_blue wrote:
Mar. 25th, 2004 09:46 pm (UTC)
These are wonderful!
| Reply | Thread
[info]orchidbones wrote:
Mar. 25th, 2004 10:02 pm (UTC)
i love the places you find and capture...

these are beautiful!!
| Reply | Thread
[info]mr_guy_thomas wrote:
Mar. 25th, 2004 11:00 pm (UTC)
That is super super rad.

I'm diggin it DOWN!
| Reply | Thread
[info]veganinja wrote:
Mar. 25th, 2004 11:21 pm (UTC)
Not just cool for an exploration, but beautiful in an aesthetic sense. (though your lanky-ass friend does make those pictures a little less serious and stark)

I added you as a friend due to the uncommon interestingness of your journal.
| Reply | Thread
[info]dyfferent wrote:
Mar. 26th, 2004 04:40 am (UTC)
I love these! You have a wonderful eye.

That pretty purple flower, by the way, is called bastard toadwort.

The one about housekeeping is my current desktop right now :)
| Reply | Thread
[info]a_mccausland wrote:
Mar. 26th, 2004 05:23 am (UTC)
fantastic, i love walking around places like this
| Reply | Thread
[info]plasticbags wrote:
Mar. 26th, 2004 07:30 am (UTC)
yes
damn girl.
hot damn.

one is better than the next.
i think you should send your photos
to various galleries. really, you are amazing and you know it, so do more with what you got. shot for the stars.
#8 and #11 outta sight!
| Reply | Thread
[info]moderndisaster wrote:
Mar. 27th, 2004 01:53 pm (UTC)

21.jpg (oh, reflections!) and the very 1st one.
hot hot hot.

i'm finally photographing in miami tomorrow. i wish i did more. i wish i did more.
| Reply | Thread
[info]jtotheneezy wrote:
Mar. 29th, 2004 10:07 am (UTC)
Wow, I really liked this set of pictures. Enough so, I'm going to add you to friends, if thats ok. That place where you took pictures looks a lot like a lot of the palces in my town. Ol Fredericksburg is such an old historical place.. Good job man.. These are all so good.
| Reply | Thread
[info]jen_shumate wrote:
Mar. 29th, 2004 10:15 am (UTC)
thanks :)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
( Leave a comment )